Primary secondary and tertiary sources of information pdf

This is a failed proposal. Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want primary secondary and tertiary sources of information pdf revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump.

All articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. WP:Sources Though we may report the attributed opinions of reliable authors, articles should never include the opinions of Wikipedians themselves, even if you are an expert who has read any number of primary, secondary, or tertiary sources. Your opinions and interpretations do not belong in an article. But it is appropriate to document interpretations of events, data, or opinions, as published in reliable secondary source material.

Peer-reviewed sources are especially valued. The question of whether source material is secondary or primary should not, however, become a focal point for edit warring.

scroll to top